Treatment of Refractory Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus With Methotrexate.

We report the successful treatment of severe vulvar lichen sclerosus refractory to topical corticosteroids in 3 adult female patients using low-dose oral methotrexate. All cases reported symptomatic and clinical improvement within 12 weeks.

Attitudes Toward Proactive Topical Corticosteroid Use Among Women With Vulval Lichen Sclerosus.

OBJECTIVES: Some practitioners are adopting proactive topical corticosteroid (TCS) therapy for vulval lichen sclerosus (VLS). We sought to understand patient attitudes toward proactive TCS therapy for VLS in a context in which proactive therapy is adopted. METHODS: Four online focus group discussions with 12 participants. Data analysis was informed by social constructionist grounded theory. RESULTS: All participants had accepted a proactive regimen. Three themes were developed from the analysis: "Coming to accept proactive therapy," "Motivators to maintaining a proactive regimen," and "The importance of a routine that fits me." Within each theme are subthemes illustrating different dimensions of the theme. CONCLUSIONS: Accepting proactive TCS therapy for VLS requires incorporating regular TCS use into a patient's identity, unlearning previous understandings regarding the safety of long-term TCS use, and adopting a regimen that fits within patients' lives and minimizes the loss of autonomy.

Monitoring adherence to vulvar lichen sclerosus treatment - a prospective study.

Background: Vulvar lichen sclerosus treatment consists of topical corticosteroids followed by maintenance therapy. Self-reported adherence to topical corticosteroids in vulvar lichen sclerosus is approximately 66-70.4% and adherence to chronic topical medications is poor.Objective: To measure treatment adherence for vulvar lichen sclerosus.Methods: Adults with vulvar lichen sclerosus who were receiving or who were candidates to receive treatment with topical clobetasol propionate 0.05% ointment twice daily received medication tubes equipped with adherence monitors capturing the time and amount of dose dispensed. After 2 months, monitors were returned, and patients were surveyed regarding their adherence.Results: Ten patients participated for a median (range) of 8.5 (7-11) weeks. Eight (80%) and 7 (70%) caps captured medication timing and dosing events, respectively. Median (interquartile range) adherence was 65% (42-77) and median (interquartile range) medication dispensed per use was 0.15 (0.14 - 0.5) grams. Of the 8 patients using active adherence monitors, 2 did not clinically improve; adherence rates and mean quantity dispensed for these two patients were 31% and 0.13 grams, and 9% and 0.74 grams, respectively.Conclusion: Poor adherence to both twice daily application and prescribed medication quantity occurred frequently. Factors related to self-reported non-adherence included perceived greater efficacy, inconvenience, and time-constraints. Patient adherence to recommended treatment and clinical outcomes are areas for improvement in patients with vulvar lichen sclerosus.

Topical 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-photodynamic therapy (PDT) for lichen sclerosus of face: case report and literature review.

Lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis typical of the genital region, with rare involvement of extragenital areas and particularly the face. LS therapeutic management is challenging, and common therapies including topical and systemic corticosteroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors, surgery are often ineffective. Herein, we present a case of LS occurred in a 36-year-old girl with facial involvement resistant to therapy with systemic corticosteroids and topical tacrolimus. Considering the involvement of a sensitive area, the young age of the patient, and the consistent clinical experience in using photodynamic therapy for the treatment of facial skin disease, we started a treatment with topical 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-photodynamic therapy (PDT) with a dosage of 37 J/cm2 once a month. We compared our case with eight other facial LS patients from the literature and treated differently.

Systemic Therapy for Lichen Sclerosus: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic, inflammatory process affecting predominantly anogenital skin, with extragenital involvement in up to 20% of cases. The mainstay of therapy for anogenital LS is topical immunosuppression. However, in treatment-refractory cases, severe, or hypertrophic disease, systemic modalities may be used. Currently, there are no guidelines for systemic therapy in LS. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to provide a review of the current literature on use of systemic therapies for LS, including demographic and clinical features of LS, as well as reported outcomes. METHODS: A primary literature search was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science, from the year the journal was published until June 2022. RESULTS: Ultimately, 71 studies consisting of 392 patients were included. Of these, 65% (n = 254) had anogenital disease, 9% (n = 36) had extragenital disease, and 19% (n = 73) had both anogenital and extragenital disease, and in 7% (n = 29) of cases, location was not specified. The most frequent therapies, stratified by total cases, included oral retinoids (n = 227), methotrexate (n = 59), hydroxychloroquine (n = 36), and systemic steroids (prednisone, methylprednisolone, prednisolone, oral triamcinolone, and other systemic steroids) (n = 60). Overall, 76% (n = 194) of anogenital, 94% (n = 34) of extragenital, and 81% (n = 59) of patients with both anogenital and extragenital involvement were reported to have clinical or symptomatic improvement. CONCLUSION: Overall, we found many therapies that have been used with reported success for extragenital and genital LS. However, future studies are needed to better define treatment outcomes and directly compare efficacy of different therapies for LS.

Combination of high-frequency electrocautery therapy and ALA-PDT in hyperkeratotic vulvar lichen sclerosus: Series of seven cases.

SIGNIFICANCE: ALA-PDT effectively treats Vulvar lichen sclerosus et atrophicus (VLSA), but it requires multiple repetitions for satisfactory results. To enhance efficacy, we employed a combination of high-frequency electrocautery therapy and ALA-PDT in treating seven VLSA patients. APPROACH: Lesions and leukoplakia in the seven women with VLSA were removed using a high-frequency generator. PDT was administered after wound healing, and it was repeated six times. Follow-up assessments were carried out at 1, 3, and 6 months to evaluate the severity of pruritus and investigate lesion repigmentation. RESULTS: Following the combined therapy, the disappearance of pruritus was observed in all patients, and normal color and thickness were restored to their skin. Two patients reported mild pruritus with a score of 2 one month after treatment, which persisted until the 6-month follow-up, while the remaining patients remained free from pruritus. No recurrence of skin lesions was observed in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The combined therapy for the treatment of VLSA is found to be convenient, effective, and easily promotable.

Conservative Management of Penile and Urethral Lichen Sclerosus: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: We evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of currently available conservative management options for penile and urethral lichen sclerosus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of existing literature on lichen sclerosus was conducted utilizing the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. References were assessed for relevance to nonsurgical management of male genital lichen sclerosus by title and abstract by 3 independent reviewers, then reviewed in full and in duplicate by 5 independent reviewers. RESULTS: Seventeen studies describing conservative management of histologically confirmed penile and urethral lichen sclerosus in male patients were included in the final review. We present available evidence supporting the use of 4 major treatment modalities represented in the existing literature: topical corticosteroids, tacrolimus, platelet-rich plasma, and CO2 laser. We also briefly discuss the limited studies on the use of oral acitretin and polydeoxyribonucleotide injections. Outcomes assessed include symptoms, clinical appearance, quality of life, sexual satisfaction, adverse effects, and long-term efficacy of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Topical corticosteroids remain the mainstay of conservative management of penile and urethral lichen sclerosus, with current literature supporting the use of other therapies such as tacrolimus and platelet-rich plasma as alternatives or adjuvant treatments when escalation of treatment is necessary. Future research should further explore the efficacy and safety of newer therapies through additional controlled clinical trials in the targeted population.

Photodynamic therapy for male genital lichen sclerosus with urethral stricture-Case report.

Male genital lichen sclerosus (MGLSc) typically impacts the external genitalia, resulting in balanitis, erectile pain, urination symptoms, and/or urinary retention. Urethral stricture develops in up to 20 % of these patients, which is usually found in the distal part of the urethra but can, in severe instances, impact the entire urethra and cause structural changes. Patients with skin lesions limited to the foreskin and partially extending to the glans can typically be cured by circumcision, but the recurrence rate of stricture is high when the glans or urethra is extensively involved. In the following case report, we describe a 45-year-old man with a history of MGLSc for 3 years and urethral stricture for 2 years, and these conditions remained untreated after circumcision. We emphasize that treatment with 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) may further improve outcomes in such severe cases.

Prevalence of prescribing topical corticosteroids to patients with lichen sclerosus following surgery for vulvar cancer: a survey among gynaecologic oncologists in The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Vulvar lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis which can progress to precursor lesion differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN) and vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). The risk of developing recurrent vulvar cancer following LS-associated VSCC is high. Evidence suggests that treatment of LS with topical corticosteroids (TCS) can prevent progression to dVIN, VSCC and recurrences. However, current guidelines do not give any recommendation on the management of LS following surgery for VSCC. The aim of this study was to conduct a survey among all registered gynaecologic oncologists (GOs) in the Netherlands to evaluate the current management of LS patients without a history of VSCC (LSnoVSCC) and patients with LS following surgery for VSCC (LSVSCC). METHODS: An online survey was distributed to all registered GOs in the Netherlands. Primary outcome measures were the frequency, type and duration of TCS treatment prescribed for LSnoVSCC and LSVSCC patients, separately. As a secondary outcome measure, reasons for treating or not treating patients with LSnoVSCC and LSVSCC with TCS were analysed. RESULTS: Forty-four GOs completed the survey, resulting in a response rate of 75%. TCS were prescribed more often to patients with LSnoVSCC as compared to patients with LSVSCC (86% versus 52%, respectively, p < 0.001). If treatment was initiated, ultra-potent (class IV) TCS were most commonly prescribed for an indefinite period of time for both patient groups. The most reported reason for treating patients in both groups with TCS was symptoms, followed by clinical aspects of the lesion and prevention of progression to dVIN and VSCC. CONCLUSION: The majority of GOs who participated in our study endorse the utilisation of long-term ultra-potent TCS therapy in both patients with LSnoVSCC and LSVSCC. Nevertheless, Dutch GOs are currently prescribing TCS more frequently to patients with LSnoVSCC than to patients with LSVSCC.

Vulvar lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic skin condition which may progress to vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) through differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN). LS symptoms are treated with topical corticosteroids (TCS), which can also prevent progression to dVIN and VSCC. However, current international guidelines do not give any recommendation on the treatment of LS following surgery for VSCC. To evaluate the current management of LS patients without a history of VSCC (LS^noVSCC) and patients with LS following surgery for VSCC (LS^VSCC), a survey study was conducted among all gynaecologic oncologists (GOs) in The Netherlands. The findings of this study demonstrate that Dutch GOs prescribed TCS more often to patients with LS^noVSCC as compared to patients with LS^VSCC. However, when deciding to prescribe TCS, the majority of Dutch GOs prescribed ultra-potent TCS for an indefinite period of time for both LS^noVSCC and LS^VSCC patients.

Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Adipose-Derived Stem Cell (ADSC) Therapy in the Treatment of Genital Lichen Sclerosus: A Comprehensive Review.

Lichen sclerosus (LS) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis mostly localized in the genital area, characterized by vulvar alterations that can severely impact a patient's quality of life. Current treatment modalities often provide incomplete relief, and there is a need for innovative approaches to manage this condition effectively. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) have emerged as potential regenerative therapies for LS, offering promising results in clinical practice. This comprehensive review explores the utilization of PRP and ADSC therapy in the treatment of genital LS, highlighting their mechanisms of action, safety profiles, and clinical outcomes. PRP is a blood product enriched in growth factors and cytokines, which promotes tissue regeneration, angiogenesis, and immune modulation. ADSC regenerative potential relies not only in their plasticity but also in the secretion of trophic factors, and modulation of the local immune response. Numerous studies have reported the safety of PRP and ADSC therapy for genital LS. Adverse events are minimal and typically involve mild, self-limiting symptoms, such as transient pain and swelling at the injection site. Long-term safety data are encouraging, with no significant concerns identified in the literature. PRP and ADSC therapy have demonstrated significant improvements in LS-related symptoms, including itching, burning, dyspareunia, and sexual function. Additionally, these therapies enable many patients to discontinue the routine use of topical corticosteroids. Several studies have explored the efficacy of combining PRP and ADSC therapy for LS. In combination, PRP and ADSCs seem to offer a synergistic approach to address the complex pathophysiology of LS, particularly in the early stages. The use of PRP and ADSC therapy for genital lichen sclerosus represents a promising and safe treatment modality. These regenerative approaches have shown significant improvements in LS-related symptoms, tissue trophism, and histological features. Combination therapy, which harnesses the synergistic effects of PRP and ADSCs, is emerging as a preferred option, especially in early-stage LS cases. Further research, including randomized controlled trials and long-term follow-up, is warranted to elucidate the full potential and mechanisms of PRP and ADSC therapy in the management of genital LS. These regenerative approaches hold great promise in enhancing the quality of life of individuals suffering from this challenging condition.

Fat Grafting in Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: Long Term Follow-Up.

OBJECTIVE: The rationale for the use of autologous fat grafting in the treatment of vulvar lichen sclerosus (VLS) consists in reduction of inflammation, regeneration of tissues, volume increase, and pain fiber control. The main outcome of this study was the evaluation of patients' satisfaction after treatment. Secondary outcomes included modifications in symptoms, psychosexual wellbeing, vulvar hydration, and histology after surgery. METHODS: Eligible for this study were women aged 18-85 years with a histological diagnosis of VLS who underwent at least one autologous vulvar fat grafting at the authors' center, between 2010 and 2019. In 2021, all women underwent a clinical reevaluation, comprehensive of vulvoscopy, vulvar biopsy, and handing out of validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Overall, 88.7% of patients declared themselves very satisfied/satisfied with the procedure. All symptoms were improved postsurgery; in particular, the difference was statistically significant for pruritus, burning, and dyspareunia ( p < .05). Sexual function was also improved at time of reevaluation, as were depressive and anxiety symptoms ( p < .05). No cases of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer occurred during follow-up and vulvar architecture remained stable, although patients reported a significantly reduced need for topical steroids ( p < .0001). Lastly, in postoperative biopsies, inflammatory infiltrate was stable or reduced, and the distribution of elastic fibers was comparable or restored in most patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patient satisfaction with fat grafting is detectable up to 11 years after surgery, and as such, it may represent a valid therapeutic option in selected cases of VLS.

The impact of limited access of photodynamic therapy during COVID-19 pandemic on patients with vulvar lichen sclerosus.

OBJECTIVES: Stressful situations have an impact on progression of lichen sclerosus. The aim of the study was to investigate fears and complaints of patients with vulvar lichen sclerosus and progression of disease at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis was based on 103 women with mean age was 64.81 ± 11.36 years divided into two groups. The first one comprised of patients with stabilization of disease during the pandemic with mean age 66.02 ± 10.01 (32-87), while the second one with progression of vulvar symptoms with mean age 63.49 ± 12.66 (25-87). RESULTS: Delay of diagnosis was reported to be a problem for respectively 25.93% of women from both groups. Fear about COVID-19 was described respectively by 57.4% and 55.1%. Stabilization of disease was more frequent in patients after photodynamic therapy before pandemic. Progression of vulvar symptoms and features were observed more in patients who did not conduct PDT previously. All patients from the second group who underwent photodynamic therapy reported disappointment because of no access for continuation of treatment. On the other hand, 81.4% (43 women) regret that have no chance for trying photodynamic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Photodynamic therapy seems to be a method of treatment with longer survival without progression of lichen sclerosus in times of pandemics. There has been no investigation until now about concerns of patients with vulvar lichen sclerosus. Better understanding of problems connected with the pandemic can help medical personnel in taking care of patients with vulvar lichen sclerosus.